Earlier today, reading some lively back-and-forth comments on the blog written by my principal, I came across this statement by a chemistry-teaching colleague of mine:
At this age there’s a LOT of boring, fact based learning that needs to take place BEFORE deeper, more meaningful, creative learning and problem solving can take place.
Well, I strongly disagree (albeit respectfully, because I really like and respect this particular colleague). I don’t have any problem with his contention that a good education includes a lot of “fact-based learning”—even in an age of hyper-available information—but I disagree that this stage needs to come first or that it’s inevitably boring.
Perhaps the most powerful learning experience I ever had as a student was my original WMA Wilderness First Responder certification class back in 1993 at North Carolina Outward Bound School. From the very beginning of the course, we would start each new topic with a hands-on simulation, where “rescuers” would try (and fail) to make sense of what was going on with injured/sick “patients.” Only after struggling with a new problem—like a patient with abdominal bruising, elevated heart rate and respiration, and dropping blood pressure—would we start to learn the “boring” details of exactly how the circulatory and respiratory systems worked in tandem, or the implications of hypovolemic shock’s progressing from a compensated to decompensated stage. The basic learning sequence was exactly reversed from what my colleague maintains is necessary. Nonetheless, I’m pretty confident I learned far more “facts” in that week-long course than I could have in a whole semester of traditional lectures, and, in this context, none of them were boring. More to the point, nearly twenty years later I still remember most of what I learned. Vividly.
All the research about contextual and constructivist learning tells us something we should already know to be gut-level true, that new information is most readily assimilated when the learner has some sort of internal frame of reference, like prior knowledge (or lack of knowledge, a need-to-know), that gives it a place to stick. Starting with the “facts” before moving on to “meaningful, creative learning and problem solving” seems both woefully inefficient and, yes, boring.
So what does all this have to do with last week’s trip down the Oconee River with Paddle Georgia 2011? Well, I happened to come across this blogversation today as I was editing together some trip video with a focus on my boys’ river education. If you sat them down and asked them what they learned, they’d have plenty to say, I think, but I’ve been thinking a lot in terms of future dividends. Nothing creates a richer, more receptive frame of reference for future learning than direct experience and emotional connection:
For starters, esteemed chemistry colleague, Will and I both agree that we’re ready to learn just what’s going on at the molecular level when we learned how to test for dissolved oxygen in the Adopt-a-Stream training sessions.
Let me say it again: nothing creates a richer, more receptive frame of reference for future learning than direct experience and emotional connection. Which is why I’m still a little skeptical about the headlong rush to embrace technology in education (while my school takes small steps towards more experiential and-place-based learning, we have moved with astonishing rapidity to provide every student with a MacBook).
Anyway, enough soap-boxing . . . let me make a couple of remarks about the video clips.
First, they capture budding naturalist Andrew’s eagerness to pick up critters. He never stopped trying to grab frogs, tadpoles, lizards, salamanders, dragonflies, grasshoppers, fish, water striders, unmentionable squiggly things on the bottoms of river rocks. At base camp in Milledgeville, he proudly informed me that earlier he had “caught something-that-looked-kinda-like-a-scorpion-but-wasn’t” but couldn’t find me to show it off and had to let it go. I’m wondering if I went wrong somewheres in my parenting duty.
Second, I should mention that the tire we barged out was only one of about 70 that Paddle Georgia folks removed on our designated clean-up day. One guy had something like 13 tires either stacked on the deck of his sea kayak or hanging off the sides like tugboat fenders.
Third, who knew kaolin was so cool?
And finally, the last clip is a hat-tip to colleague and educational über-blogger John Burk in the spirit of recognizing and celebrating failure.


Clark – so cool – I have started following you recently and love hearing about your adventures with the boys! Very cool stuff. Also, as always, we are on the same page with the hesitancy regarding technology. Great post – you’ve inspired me! Hope all is well – I will be adding to my blog as I take the girls down to the beach for most of July, where we will conquer swimming lessons and the dreaded sand…yes, I have girls:)
Clark,
I completely agree with you regarding the merits of experiential learning. All of my courses have strong field-based components. My concern is that instead of promoting experience-based learning as either a complement or prelude to fact-based learning, I’m seeing shifts that focus on experiences in lieu of fact-based learning. As a result, I see a lot of freshmen who are well-versed in biology trivia (e.g., Horseshoe crabs have blue blood) but few who understand the underlying facts (e.g., Horseshoe crabs transport oxygen with hemocyanin instead of hemoglobin). I suspect that our society’s fascination with the availability of clickable knowledge (i.e., wiki) has diluted our willingness to delve further in to serious learning. My best results in teaching involve a marriage of experiences, fact-learning, with only a sprinkling of technology. It’s probably not legal for those three things to be married in Mississippi though.
BTW, if you and the boys are ever looking for some new rivers/landscapes to explore, I’d be happy to show you some spots in south MS that are as pristine as you can find in the southeast.
Cheers,
Mike
From a parent whose child isn’t a conventional learner and who has a very weak recall of random facts (especially facts that don’t support/drive an area of expertise or interest so they become part of his long term memory, where they are or actually become useful), I agree that experience, even interested based learning is ideal. It taps into all the senses– a great (not boring) way to learn facts that are meaningful to ones personality and life and make people good at what they do!
This is fantastic. As a Mom to two boys, I foresee us doing things like this in the near future. As it stands now – we are outdoors exploring more than indoors. Bugs, grubs, worms, caterpillars, frogs, etc. the world is their zoo. And our 6yr old says he is going to be an Entomologist when he gets older.
My 18yr old niece is finishing up her thru-hike of the AT. She’s a northbounder. She entered Maine two days ago, and she hopes to finish her hike by July 27th. I’ve kept a blog about her adventure. http://lenorediane.com/category/adventure-girls-trail-tales/